Cit v hindustan bulk carriers

Author: hxyv

August undefined, 2024

WebMay 7, 2024 · In the Landmark Judgement of CIT V Hindustan bulk carriers case Importance of Interpretation of Statutes Conclusion Read more: – The Principle of Natural Justice Right to Die under Article 21 in the fundamental right Concept of state under Article 12 of the Constitution of India According to Salmond WebIt is the contention of learned counsel for the appellant-Revenue that the said order is illegal and erroneous, in view of the judgment rendered by this court in CIT v. Anjum M.H. Ghaswalaand also the decision rendered by this court in C. A. Nos. 7966-7967 of 1996 entitled CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carrierson December 17, 2002, [2003] 259 ITR 449. 6.

Capital Cables ( India) Pvt. Ltd. vs Income-Tax Settlement ... on 13 ...

WebDec 29, 2024 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers, the Supreme Court of India established the fundamental five tenets of the harmonious construction rule. It is the responsibility of the court to avoid a dispute between two legislation sections by harmonizing them so that both remain in effect. WebFeb 26, 2024 · In the landmark case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers [4], the Supreme Court laid down five rules of conducting the doctrine of harmonious construction:- The courts must avoid any clash of seemingly contradicting provisions, and they should try to harmonize such contradictory or contrasting provisions. fish scale labs

Protection against ex-post facto law in India : its pros & cons

WebOct 8, 2002 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers: Court: SUPREME COURT: Relevant Act: Income-tax: Date of Order: 08/10/2002 : Judgment: View Judgment: Keyword Tags: settlement … WebFeb 6, 2024 · The Supreme Court laid down five principles of rule of Harmonious Construction in the landmark case of CIT v Hindustan Bulk Carriers: The courts must … WebSep 22, 2024 · The Court in the case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers laid down the five principles of harmonious construction- The courts must avoid a ‘head of clash’ of contradictory provisions and they must construe the contradictory provisions so as to harmonize them. fish scale lab values

Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers

Doctrine of Harmonious Construction: Preventing Conflict in Society

WebHindustan Bulk Carriers. 3. Doctrine of Eclipse This doctrine is applicable to pre-existing laws under Article 13 (1). Article 13 provides that any law which made before the commencement of constitution must be consistent with the part III of the constitution. WebDec 17, 2002 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers C.A.No.7966 - 67 of 1996 Decided On, 17 December 2002 At, Supreme Court of India By, THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.B. … fish scale kids bookWebCommissioner Of Income Tax vs M/S. Hindustan Bulk Carriers on 17 December, 2002. Author: A Pasayat. Bench: Arijit Pasayat. CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 7966-67 of … fish scale lamp

"WebDec 14, 2024 · In CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers, (2003) 3 SCC 57, p. 74 case, the Court held that the courts must avoid a ‘head of clash’ of contradictory provisions and they must construe the contradictory … " - Cit v hindustan bulk carriers

Cit v hindustan bulk carriers

Doctrine of Harmonious Construction - LawLex.Org

WebIn CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers, the supreme court stated five important principles and they are: The courts must avoid a conflict between conflicting provisions by construing … WebOct 8, 2002 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers . N. Santosh Hegde, J.— The question involved in these appeals pertains to determination of the starting point in regard to payment of …

Did you know?

WebNov 5, 2024 · Supreme Court has laid down five principles of rule of Harmonious Construction in the landmark case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers: Ejusdem Generis … WebMay 22, 2024 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers, (2003) 3 SCC 57, p. 74.) The provision of one section cannot be used to defeat the provision contained in another unless the court, …

WebIn the case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers [4] the Hon'ble Supreme Court has laid down following points to be considered for harmonious construction: It is duty of the court to keep away from two-seemingly contradicting sections of the Act and try to harmonize them unless WebMay 22, 2024 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers, (2003) 3 SCC 57, p. 74.) The provision of one section cannot be used to defeat the provision contained in another unless the court, despite all its effort, is unable to find a way to reconcile their differences.

WebThe Supreme Court in the CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers, 259 ITR 449 pointed out that there is no power to waive tax or interest as tax or interest has to be determined under the provisions of the Act. 4. WebThe Supreme Court laid down five principles of rule of Harmonious Construction in the landmark case of CIT v Hindustan Bulk Carriers: 1. The courts must avoid a head on …

WebMay 8, 2024 · Principals of the Doctrine. In the case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carrier[i], the Supreme Court gave five principles for interpreting the statute which are following: 1. …

Web3 CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers 2003 TAXLR 102. Jus Corpus Law Journal (JCLJ) www.juscorpus.com VOL. 1 ISSUE 1 180 4. Courts must also bear in mind that harmonious construction is not an understanding that reduces one clause to useless numbers or dead. 5. Harmonization is not the dissolution or making of any constitutional provision fish scale graftWebDec 17, 2002 · Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers Supreme Court Of India Dec 17, 2002 Subsequent References CaseIQ TM (AI Recommendations) Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers Important Paras Please sign up to view Important Paras. Summary Please sign up to view Summary. JUDGMENT … fish scale lamp shade candlewood nogalesWebDec 21, 2024 · Venkataramana Devaru v. State of Mysore, 1958 AIR 255. Justice GP Singh, Principles of Statutory Interpretation, 9th edn (2004) 131. CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers (2003) 3 SCC 57. Raj Krushna Bose v. Binod Kanungo & ors, 1954 AIR 202. Representation of People Act, 1951 Section 33(2) & 123(8). M.S.M. Sharma v. Krishna Sinha, AIR … fish scale lace pattern knittingWebJun 16, 2024 · Hindustan Bulk Carriers, (2003) 3 SCC 57, p. 74. viiSultana Begum v. Premchand Jain, AIR 1997 SC 1006, pp. 1009, 1010. viiiCIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers, (2003) 3 SCC 57, p. 74. ixIbid. xState of U.P. v. Renusagar Power Co., AIR 1988 SC 1737, p. 1751. xiOSBORN’S Law Dictionary. candlewood njWebJan 24, 2024 · In Indian constitution, no absolute right is given to its citizens therefore Art 20 (1) subject to certain restrictions. Preventive Detention In order to maintain peace and to … fish scale leather stampWebNov 5, 2024 · Supreme Court has laid down five principles of rule of Harmonious Construction in the landmark case of CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers: The courts should avoid such provisions which are contradicting in nature and which brings the head-on clash between each other. candlewood northland